TRUMP REINSTATES CONTROVERSIAL TRAVEL BAN: 19 COUNTRIES TARGETED IN SHOCK ANNOUNCEMENT
In a stunning announcement from the White House on June 4, 2025, former U.S. President Donald Trump declared the reactivation of a sweeping travel ban targeting citizens from 19 nations — a move already sending ripples through international and humanitarian communities.
Effective Monday at 12:01 a.m., the ban outright bars entry to travelers from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. In addition, seven more countries — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela — will face tightened entry restrictions.
Trump cited national security threats, referencing a recent terror incident in Colorado and findings from the Department of Homeland Security’s annual report. He emphasized high visa overstay rates and what he called “inadequate vetting infrastructure” in the affected nations.
“This is not about politics. It’s about protecting American lives,” Trump stated firmly at the press event.
Yet the backlash was immediate and fierce. Humanitarian groups, immigration rights advocates, and foreign policy experts condemned the move as a “dangerous revival” of the infamous 2017 travel ban**, which was widely criticized and branded by many as a “Muslim ban”. That earlier order led to widespread chaos at airports and protests around the globe before being upheld in a revised form by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018.
This new ban carries echoes of the past — but with a broader scope. While some critics believe it targets vulnerable populations under the guise of security, Trump’s camp maintains the directive is “data-driven” and a lawful outcome of his January 20 executive order demanding national security reviews of high-risk travel corridors.
Notably, Afghanistan’s inclusion has struck a particularly raw nerve. The U.S. had previously welcomed thousands of Afghan allies after its 2021 military withdrawal. Critics argue the ban betrays those efforts. The White House clarified that Afghans holding Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) will be exempt, but skepticism remains.
Refugee advocates warn the ban could fuel global instability, delay family reunifications, and harm America’s reputation as a safe haven for the persecuted. Meanwhile, Trump’s supporters laud the move as a return to “strong borders and common sense.”
As the world reacts and legal challenges loom, the debate over balancing security and compassion is reignited — once again placing immigration policy at the heart of America’s global image.
Stay with WÒRDS FÓR YÔU for unfolding coverage.
🕊️ Bringing Bhutan’s voice to the world.
