Reintroduction of Class 10 Cut-Off Point Sparks Debate: Motivation for Students, Financial Burden for Parents

The Ministry of Education’s decision to reintroduce the cut-off point for Class 10 students, starting next year, has ignited a wave of mixed reactions among students, teachers, and parents. While the move is seen as a way to motivate students and improve academic standards, concerns about affordability and accessibility to education have raised significant questions about its broader implications.  

Under the new policy, only students who meet the yet-to-be-determined minimum score will gain admission to Class 11 in government schools. The cut-off point, which was discontinued in 2019 to ensure no student was left behind, is now being revived to encourage higher academic performance. However, the decision has left many stakeholders divided.  

**Students and Teachers Welcome the Move**  

For some students, the reintroduction of the cut-off point has served as a wake-up call. Rigzen Jamsel Wangmo, a student at Loselling Middle Secondary School, shared, “The cut-off point keeps me motivated, especially since I was quite relaxed last year and in previous years. It pushes me to study even harder and give my full effort. Even my usually relaxed friends have started studying more seriously than before.”  

Yewong D Seldon, a student at Yangchenphug Higher Secondary School, echoed similar sentiments, stating, “The cut-off point benefits all students by motivating them to study harder, especially since Class 10 marks play a crucial role in their academic future.”  

Teachers have also expressed support for the policy, citing its potential to foster discipline and focus among students. Pema Dorji, Vice Principal of Loselling Middle Secondary School, remarked, “In the absence of a cut-off point, I felt that students were content with merely passing the exam. When given too much relaxation, students may become distracted, roam around, or even engage in substance abuse. Therefore, the reintroduction will help ensure that students stay focused and committed to their studies.”  

Thinley Namgay, a teacher at Yangchenphug Higher Secondary School, added, “The cut-off point is highly beneficial for schools, as it encourages students to focus on their studies and work harder.”  

**Parents Voice Financial Concerns**  

Despite the optimism from educators and students, many parents are apprehensive about the financial implications of the policy. With private school fees soaring as high as 130,000 ngultrum, families fear they may not be able to afford alternative education for their children who fail to meet the cut-off mark.  

Tsheten Wangda, a parent and farmer, expressed his concerns, saying, “Parents who can afford it can allow their students to continue their studies. As a farmer, I believe this is a significant challenge for us. If my children can study up to grade 12 without any limitations, I would feel truly happy about it.”  

Tenzin Dorji, another parent, highlighted the financial strain, stating, “It will be challenging for me to afford my children’s higher education in private schools. It would be great if there could be an alternative solution to this issue. While the government and teachers are working to improve the quality of education, the financial burden is a significant concern.”  

**Unanswered Questions and Lingering Uncertainties**  

The reintroduction of the cut-off point has also raised several unanswered questions. What will happen to private schools that were previously closed? What alternative pathways is the Ministry of Education considering for students who do not meet the cut-off mark or secure admission into private schools? Will this decision genuinely improve the quality of education, which many believe is already declining?  

Moreover, concerns about the regulation of private school fees and the potential for increased dropout rates among economically disadvantaged students remain unresolved. As the policy takes effect next year, stakeholders are calling for a more comprehensive approach that balances academic rigor with equitable access to education.  

While the cut-off point aims to raise educational standards, its success will ultimately depend on how the government addresses the financial and logistical challenges it poses. For now, the debate continues, with hopes that a middle ground can be found to benefit all students, regardless of their socioeconomic background.